On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 03:50 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
If there's a need for interoperability between Rev-based apps from differentI think it is a good idea to start thinking about this.
authors, we could define a standard for the function name, something like
SocketDictionary().
Six not-very-concrete thoughts off the top of my head:
Some method of one scheme should be very easy for newbies to use.
The basis should allow for RPC, messaging, state reflection and maybe other models.
The overall model should allow client-server, source-sink as well as other relationships.
Models should be very Revolution and optimized about Revolution concepts such as handlers, functions, strings, properties, objects...
Standards are OK where they help, but not when they get in the way.
This should be tough/robust/tenacious rather than reporting lots of errors. (But maybe there can be two ways to do this.)
Dar Scott
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
