I guess I can do my own workaround for each stack design, but it requires some bookkeeping/hassle. Some of the inheritance elegance is lost. (As an idealist, things like this really chafe me.)
-- D -----Original Message----- From: Jeanne A. E. DeVoto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 5:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: textFont -> empty At 3:18 PM -0800 1/4/03, Ivers, Doug E wrote: >> When I set the textFont of a field to empty (so that the >> owner determines the font face), the textSize is also set to >> empty. Conversely, when the textFont is empty and I set the >> textSize to something, the textFont is no longer empty -- and >> it doesn't even take on the owners textFont. Is this fixed >> in 2.0? Is there a workaround? This hasn't changed in 2.0. What sort of workaround are you looking for? (I.e. "what do you need to do?") -- Jeanne A. E. DeVoto ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Runtime Revolution Limited - The Solution for Software Development http://www.runrev.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
