In a message dated 15/1/03 8:18:37 PM, Graham Samuel writes: << Of course if I had wanted
just the one field, I could still have grouped it with a harmless grc behind the field or something like that, so the need for the shared object to be a group is by no means a show-stopper. >> In fact you don't need to group the field with anything at all. A group can contain a single object. It is however sometimes handy to have something else in the group because it can clarify whether you have selected the group or the object you were aiming at. If a field and group are virtually co-terminous it is not always clear. Best wishes, David Glasgow Home/ forensic assessments --> <A HREF="http://members.aol.com/dvglasgow/";> DVGlasgow </A> Courses --> <A HREF="http://www.i-Psych.co.uk";>i-Psych</A> _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
