That would be true if were consistently like that, but it isn't,
length for instance has a function and a property. I can't see how
it's good programming practice to make something more complicated
than it need be.
The first thing I did was write a wrapper function for it!
All the Best
Dave
On 17 Jan 2008, at 15:59, Eric Chatonet wrote:
Hi,
Revolution is an XTalk:
Probably 'convert <value> to short date and long time' is more
English like than 'put convert(<value>,"short date","long time")
into something' :-)
I assume this has been carefully thought out since decades...
Le 17 janv. 08 à 16:50, Dave a écrit :
The problem here is that "convert" is a command rather than a
function, it would be *much* better to make it a function and
return the result.
Best regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Plugins and tutorials for Revolution: http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
