Tip for the wise: You can go around this making your own virtual machine... but that's not the most efficient way or for beginners... Limits are a hindrance more than anything...
cheerios Xavier On Jan 31, 2008 10:45 AM, Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The scriptLimits is a real PITA. I use three other commercial dev > environments, neither of which are crippled in this way. > I haven't seen this type of limit imposed elsewhere (especially Open > Source, that'd be like shooting yourself in the foot). > > I wouldn't suggest it as an 'enhancement' as it is a deliberate > limitation. > At times it feels like I'm using a trial version, purely because of > this. > > Cheers, > > Luis. > > > On 30 Jan 2008, at 19:52, Richard Gaskin wrote: > > > Andre Garzia wrote: > > > >> php is loaded as an apache module, so it has the feature of being one > >> engine handling eerything which makes some stuff easy such as session > >> tracking and data exchanges. It was also created from the ground > >> up to > >> be a web thing, thus sporting lots of libraries that helps building > >> web stuff. With Rev, we have marvelous tools for the desktop but we > >> had to coin our own web libraries. > >> php has no scriptLimits, so it can read a chunk of text with mixed > >> code in it and execute it in place, this is the way php developers > >> usually code, they create web page templates with logic mixed with > >> presentation. This is not the most elegant way that the > >> über-pro-developers do but it makes good for quick prototyping and > >> templating. With Revolution we can't do that, as soon as we reach an > >> 11 statements chunck, we're dead. > >> If we had something like mod_revolution and no scriptLimits, we could > >> conquer the web in no time. > > > > Maybe we don't need to eliminate scriptLimits in general if they > > were lifted for use within the CGI for the merge function. Such a > > restriction wouldn't pose a risk to RunRev, and would cover 99.9% > > of all useful things we'd want to do with Rev on the web, wouldn't it? > > > > Shall I submit that enhancement request? Should be simple to > > implement. > > > > Less simple would be to make an Apache module out of Rev. How much > > work do you suppose that would be? > > > > I'm not too concerned about libraries. After all, we have you. And > > on your day off we have another couple thousand scripters who > > collectively can churn out almost as much code as you. :) > > > > -- > > Richard Gaskin > > Managing Editor, revJournal > > _______________________________________________________ > > Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > use-revolution mailing list > > [email protected] > > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > > subscription preferences: > > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
