Hi,
Since they are two standalone applications they will have different
engine's and different SQLite libraries, so I don't think you could
access the same database with it getting corrupted. If you know a way
do this this I'd be VERY interested.
Thanks
All the Best
Dave
On 13 Feb 2008, at 19:08, viktoras didziulis wrote:
What about the 2 applications connecting to the same sqlite
database - one updates the db, the other checks whether and how it
was updated?..
Viktoras
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Dave wrote:
I have an application that periodically creates or updates an
SQLite database (actually there are lots of databases (separate
SQLite files), but only one is worked on at a time) and then
sends the results to the server. This process can take upwards
of 15 minutes to complete. In the meantime I want to be able to
still use the application to do other things (such as create
playlists in iTunes).
I'd use sockets, or polling for a file. While polling a file's
content can eat some cycles, polling for the existence of a file
is pretty darn fast. Given the scenario you describe, where
you're not really expecting a result for several minutes, you
could probably get away with polling for a file every few
seconds. Cheap, simple, reasonably efficient.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
