Another issue you may wish to consider, is how powerful a machine the playback will be on. A recent cient of ours had to forgo the Flash solution in favor of QT because Flash is considerably more processor intensive than QT...by a lot. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
- Flash or Quicktime? Tiemo Hollmann TB
- Re: Flash or Quicktime? Luis
- AW: Flash or Quicktime? Tiemo Hollmann TB
- Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime? Klaus Major
- Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime? Russell Martin
- Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime? Luis
- AW: AW: Flash or Quicktime? Tiemo Hollmann TB
- Re: AW: AW: Flash or Qui... Colin Holgate
- AW: AW: AW: Flash or Qui... Tiemo Hollmann TB
- Re: AW: AW: Flash or Qui... Chipp Walters
- AW: AW: AW: Flash or Qui... Tiemo Hollmann TB
- Re: Flash or Quicktime? Colin Holgate
- AW: Flash or Quicktime? Tiemo Hollmann TB
- Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime? Colin Holgate
- Re: Flash or Quicktime? Stephen Barncard
- AW: Flash or Quicktime? Tiemo Hollmann TB
- Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime? Björnke von Gierke
- Re: AW: Flash or Quicktime? Luis
- Valentina Valentine offer -= JB =-
- Re: Valentina Valentine offer Ruslan Zasukhin
