> Sadly disturbing. Makes one wonder who's making the > decisions over in Redmond. > > http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/09/business/09digi.html?_r=1&or > ef=slogin
I've told everyone in my company not to upgrade - if we get a new Vista machine, leave it. But otherwise, don't upgrade. Way, way too many applications are broken. While some apps have upgrades available, it often means an expensive upgrade for those applications. We don't need the new features, just apps that work. I am just getting my first extended dose of Vista. I picked up a system at CompUSA during their final hours on an incredible deal. What strikes me the most about it is that there's lots of eye candy that in larger organizations means lots of lots of retraining. The differences between Office 2003 and Office 2007 - why do it? I would happily pay for a SP 4 and SP 5 for XP Pro with lots of bug fixes and modest improvements. Fortunately, Valentina was not terribly impacted by Vista - we've found one irritating bug and it was addressed easily. Makes me think of Windows ME. Maybe this should have been instead, Windows ME 2 :-) Best regards, Lynn Fredricks President Paradigma Software http://www.paradigmasoft.com Valentina SQL Server: The Ultra-fast, Royalty Free Database Server _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
