On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 15:54:36 -0400, Colin Holgate wrote: > Is there something analogous to var += in Rev, that would make for > faster concatenating in simpler cases?
Not AFAIK... I used Richard Gaskin's benchmarking tool (RevBench) and compared the "put ... after t" with "put t & ... into t" and just that statement, run 50,000 times showed that the "put...after" format took 2 ticks (about 33ms) to do all 50,000 executions (0.00004 ticks (0.000667 ms) per execution) and the "put ... into" took 4378 ticks to run (0.08756 ticks (1.459333ms) per execution). So I think "put after" is about as fast as Rev's going to get... Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software, Inc. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
