Mark Schonewille wrote:
If the handler DoX actually had not existed, the list of errors would have ended at your line 5. Since it exists...
Right. That's the mystery: the handler does exist, and the erroneous error code is the only unique element in that line. The other parts of that line are all redundant information provided on other lines.
So why does the engine insist on including an erroneous and redundant entry along with all the truly useful stuff in its error info?
This is one of those times when I'd like to be able to pour Scott Raney a tall one, sit back and ask him, "What were you thinking?" :)
-- Richard Gaskin Managing Editor, revJournal _______________________________________________________ Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
