--- Ken Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > if you are looking for the classical stable > > > scripting product - its > > > here: called MC! > > > > could there be an advantage to developing an > app > > in RR then running it in MC? > > Two that I can think of - one is that you may > be able to develop faster in > Rev because of all the help that the IDE gives > you (vs. MC where a bunch of > stuff needs to be done with your own tool or > through the message box); the > other is that you may be able to take advantage > of bug fixes in the engine > which haven't made their way into Rev yet. For > example, suppose MC releases > 2.5 at the same time as Rev 2.0. If MC finds > and squashes some bugs in 2.5.1 > and it takes a couple of months for RR to > upgrade to the new engine, you can > take advantage of the fixes in MC early. > > That said, you also can run into serious > problems going from Rev to MC as > well... if you're using add ons (like the XML > external, database externals, > etc.) or taking advantage of the main Rev > scripting library calls (like > revGoURL), you won't be able to utilize them in > MC.
thanks, food for thought. guess i was wondering about stability in standalones, all of the above considered. the thing is, it just FEELS better to work in RR. except that i miss the MC tool that showed all of the controls grouped by groups. ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.erikhansen.org __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
