A plugin, for some, would be seen as less of an 'installation', and
with the Vista security tightened, I suppose the browser plugin is
the 'least harmful'.
I still prefer web-borne stacks tho.
Cheers,
Luis.
On 21 May 2008, at 10:35, Jan Schenkel wrote:
--- Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm surprised there hasn't been any talk of the blog
post mentioning
better integration of Rev and the Web/Browsers.
Cheers,
Luis.
Well, I blogged about it from my 'business fotware'
point of view. But we can only tell how much of a
killer app this is, once we've been able to play with
it ourselves.
Just from a theoretical point of view, this is the
perfect way to counter Adobe Flash moving to the
desktop and the AJAX concoctions.
And don't let the Flash analogy fool you: this is a
perfect tool for business applications as well,
especially in combination with the PHP-style engine.
Anyway, if you want to read the whole entry, go to:
<http://quartam.blogspot.com>
Cheers,
Jan Schenkel.
Quartam Reports & PDF Library for Revolution
<http://www.quartam.com>
=====
"As we grow older, we grow both wiser and more foolish at the same
time." (La Rochefoucauld)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
