Lynn Fredricks wrote:
If they don't include vector sources (preferably in Fireworks
format, but I realize I'm in the minority on that one)
they'll be of limited value.
Inevitably any stock graphic will be
close-but-not-exactly-what-we-need.
Providing vector sources allows folks to modify every
aspect of the image to coordinate with other elements in their UI.
Don't you think Fireworks vectors are kind of hard because of compatibility
with other products?
Of course, as I noted. Being the best tool for crafting GUI graphics
doesn't make it the most popular. :)
Don't you think .ai would be better? Including original
stuff isnt a problem.
EPS would be a tad more universal, but either should be okay.
BTW, I use Fireworks myself and far, far prefer it to working with Photoshop
:-) Im so very glad it was ImageReady and not Fireworks that suffered from
the Adobe acquisition.
I've talked with a variety of Adobe folks about Fireworks. They're all
high. Their answer across the board is "Use Photoshop. It's better!"
It's as though they've never even booted the product they acquired.
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
