Yes, very true. This is, now its pointed out, obviously the underlying source of my power off/saving problem. Its also an argument against using the traditional splash stack and then a real program + data stack, is it not? One should rather have a program main stack, and then data substacks. No need ever to save the program stack since it never changes, just save the data stacks as changed. Is this what you usually do?
Eric Chatonet wrote: > > > I should have added that this way of doing never mix any line of code > with user's data in the same file. And I think it important. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Standalone---Using-stack-as-DB-tp18756589p18787268.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
