I give Runrev credit for not being interested in the code itself but
in solving bugs only :-)
But it does not change anything to what we said both of us.
Le 6 août 08 à 19:54, Mark Schonewille a écrit :
I have to agree with Eric. Not just because I can't read those
logs, but I can't check whether there is no information in those
logs that shouldn't leave my computer, e.g. with regard to any
confidential projects. If I can't see what I send into the public
(the QCC is public) I'd rather not send it at all.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Benefit from our inexpensive hosting services. See http://economy-x-
talk.com/server.html for more info.
On 6 aug 2008, at 19:45, Eric Chatonet wrote:
Bonsoir Jacque,
All you say is relevant as usual :-)
But I would add (because I discussed some times ago with Mark
Waddingham) that these extended Win logs are not readable by us,
poor humans, but by Runrev only.
So, it's a bit frustrating to make the effort to send something
you absolutely don't understand.
Some header in clear would help... and not feel as we were guinea
pigs only ;-)
The result: a few crash reports are finally sent.
Best regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Plugins and tutorials for Revolution: http://www.sosmartsoftware.com/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/
----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
