Kay C Lan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Ken Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Actually IIRC, it's done this way to standardize *internal* interpretation >> on all the platforms (much like Rev standardizes on forward slash for path >> delimiters). That way, regardless of whether the host OS uses LF only, CR >> only or CRLF, when text data is read in from the outside it is all >> converted >> internally to use the LF character (ASCII 10). If you want to read in the >> actual end-of-line (EOL) delimiters, you can read the file in *as binary*: >> > > Might then that explain why Mark Stuart could only get the 'binfile' version > of a solution to work. > > Sarah and Jacque told him to replace "+" & CRLF with "", but if what you > say is correct, then Rev has already removed CRLFs, no such combo should > exist? >
That's correct. > Mark, although you seem to have got a solution with binfile, does it work > with 'file' but just replacing "+" & LF ? > That is an alternative approach that should also work. Martin Baxter -- I am Not a Number, I am a free NaN _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
