I wouldn't hold my breath ;) Depending on how complex the xml is you may be better off writing your own parser from scratch, bypassing the revXML routines altogether. While the xmlparser is great there a lots of times when I don't use it to extract data from xml files/data, particularly if I don't need to write stuff back into that xml. You'd be surprised how quickly you can whip your data into shape with a few targetted replace and lineoffset routines.
Terry... On 29/8/08 10:50 AM, "David Bovill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Terry - so it's a known issue? I think I'll ignore those tags for now > in the hope that it get fixed. > > 2008/8/29 Terry Judd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> David, >> You could replace them before you load the xml (maybe with an underscore) >> or >> perhaps try Ken Ray's (excellent) 'transcript'-based XML library, which I'm >> pretty sure can deal with these types of entities. >> >> http://www.sonsothunder.com/products/xmllib/xmllib.htm >> >> HTH, >> >> Terry.. > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution -- Dr Terry Judd Lecturer in Educational Technology (Design) Biomedical Multimedia Unit Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry & Health Sciences The University of Melbourne Parkville VIC 3052 AUSTRALIA 61-3 8344 0187 _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
