On 11-Sep-08, at 7:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 11, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
Now I understand, I didn't consider not to tell rev how many sub
arrays there would be. I have no clue when this would be useful
though, maybe you can explain that?
Sure. One thing that the ability to dynamically specify a key would do
is open up additional algorithms. Let's take the XML for example.
T
... ellipsis intentional
Can anybody explain what the new array format provides that the old
did not? All these bizarre examples seem not so much as exemplifying
the ``new'' features as to leave me baffled as to what added value
they provide. In NONE of the supposed or alleged examples have I seen
anything I could not do with old arrays. So, and I mean in really
simple language (not OOP-speak), wtf is up with these new arrays? I
see nothing but extra brackets.
--
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See <http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html>
-Dr. John R. Vokey
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
