I think the logic is that moving a group to a layer under an item says that it will consider that item to be the new parent.
On 9/17/08 8:12 PM, "Chipp Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1 group "food" > 2 group "meat" > 3 button "chicken" > 4 button "beef" > 5 group "fruit" > 6 button "apple" > 7 button "orange" > 8 button "fred" A couple years ago I did something like 1 group "food" 2 button "spacer1" --invisible 3 group "meat" 4 button "chicken" 5 button "beef" 6 button "spacer2" --invisible 7 group "fruit" 8 button "apple" 9 button "orange" 10 button "spacer3" --invisible 11 button "fred" and moved the groups to a layer (layer of btn spacer2 + 1) layer (layer of btn spacer3 + 1) etc, to avoid the re-parenting that seemed to be counter-intuitive. Try it and see if this helps get you where you want to go quickly. Instead of spacer2, you could call it 'gridline2' Adding another level of hierarchy might mean spacer1, spacer11, spacer21, spacer33, etc. sorta like a matrix notation. layer (layer of btn spacer21 + 1) Jim Ault Las Vegas _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
