My first thought, years ago, was "revTalk" also.
But "talks" are not preceived as "real" languages - remember when
Apple went through all those contortions to use "scripting" instead
of "coding". Dropping "talk" helps Rev transcend its heritage and
paradigm - will result in more sales, too.
Paul Looney
On Sep 23, 2008, at 8:15 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Mikey wrote:
I liked RevCode originally, but I think, to be true to the paradigm,
revTalk is probably better, because it is clearer which dialect we're
referring to.
I generally avoid "me too" posts, but this is the first time I can
recall "RevTalk" being mentioned here, and I like it for the same
reasons: it's short, cannot be misspelled or mispronounced, and
clarifies its heritage.
--
Richard Gaskin
Managing Editor, revJournal
_______________________________________________________
Rev tips, tutorials and more: http://www.revJournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
