Mikey, I got late to this thread so forgive me if I say something terribly obvious, but you can check the visible of a stack and the result from intersect() between it's rect and the screen rect to find if it is visible and in-screen, then unless the blendlevel or the windowshape is something really odd, you should have a visible stack.
or you can play pavlov and start blinking the stack while asking the user: "hey user, do you see something blinking?" :-D Andre On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Mikey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Eric. > > Yes, one would expect that. However, the visible for the (unopened) > substack seems to be true in this case. > > I didn't want to get off on this tangent, but showing hidden substacks > seems to a little odd as well, which might be a product of the visible > property not being what I expect, but I haven't spent an enormous > amount of time trying to work on that yet. > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
