Hi Bernard,
The first part of this bug was reported already as <http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=6348
> some time ago.
Since the close box issue exists in 2.6.1 but --if I understand you
correctly-- seems to be resolved in 3.0, it makes no sense to report it.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum/
Benefit from our inexpensive hosting services. See http://economy-x-talk.com/server.html
for more info.
On 3 okt 2008, at 14:33, Bernard Devlin wrote:
The first thing I did after installing 2.6.1 on Linux was to run
Bjoernke's
chat rev stack (http://bjoernke.com/runrev/chatrev.php), since it
presented
so many problems in Rev 3.0 Linux. After creating a legacy stack
using 3.0,
in 2.6.1 I was at least able to submit more than a few lines to my
chat
server, without the IDE locking up. Even though 2.6.1 looks worse
than 3.0,
I was feeling relieved. At least I have a version of Rev that looks
like I
might be able to work with it.
Then I noticed, that the chat rev stack had no 'close' decoration. I
checked back in 3.0 and it has a 'close' decoration there. So I
opened up
my Ubuntu VM and installed 2.6.1 there. There too in 3.0 it has a
close
decoration, but not in 2.6.1.
So the same legacy stack opened in 2.6.1 on Ubuntu and Fedora has no
'close'
decoration, but on 3.0 it does have a 'close' decoration (and
'close' is one
of the items of the decorations of the stack). Oh, and whilst I had
that
legacy stack open on 3.0 on ubuntu, the IDE crashed. This was a
freshly-restarted VM, and within 2 minutes of being opened Rev 3.0
crashed.
I had done nothing but open chatrev.
Is it possible there is something in that stack that could be causing
problems? I have a lot of respect for the skills of Bjoernke and
the other
chat rev users, so I find it hard to believe that they would not
have found
any obvious bugs in the stack by now, and reported them or worked
round
them.
Chatrev is not the only thing I've had problems with in 3.0, but
since I am
also seeing such bizarre behaviour in 2.6.1, I'm starting to think I
am
jinxed.
I'm tired of weeks of bug tracking, and just want to get back to
doing some
developmen, using Linux on my new laptop. Is there any point in
adding this
information to QCC?
Bernard.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
