On Oct 14, 2008, at 2:19 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
-= JB =- wrote:
Why doesn't the Rev team take some of these examples and build a
flexible field
that everyone can use. I have heard many people mention they want
to have the
fields improved so it is obvious it would be wise economically to
provide both new
and existing Rev customers what they want.
They know that. :)
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
_______________________________________________
So does that mean Richard would be wasting his time improving
his field because the Rev team are going to incorporate all of the
things he and others have already done. They could easily add
the ability to for the end user to resize the field too.
Or does it simply mean, They know that.
Because if they have intentions of providing an exciting new field
with all of the extras I am sure Richard would be happy to work on
something that is not going to end up duplicating something that
will be a standard field for all Rev users integrated into Rev.
-=>JB<=-
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
