As far as I know, I'm not an "ass clown" like some of the vendors I
guess you have tossed out the door, but explaining Runtime Revolution
in a room full of programmers and software engineers is more difficult
than it needs to be.
That's it. That simple.
With a clear and non-confusing name for the language that is not also
the name of the company and also the IDE it would be a lot easier to
explain.
And since the patent on R++ is still out there but not being used then
how about RR++ or R+
Regards,
Tom McGrath III <--- Not an "Ass Clown"
Lazy River Software
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
iTunes Library Suite - libITS
Information and download can be found on this page:
http://www.lazyriversoftware.com/RevOne.html
On Nov 30, 2008, at 11:41 PM, Mikey wrote:
Consider the following to be constructive criticism, despite the tone.
The tone is merely a vehicle to illustrate the point plainly.
1) R++ is already taken.
2) Why are you embarrassed about the environment?
3) You're in Europe. Rev is in Edinburough, Scotland. How is that
possibly bad?
4) IMHO, nothing is worse than lying or trying to cover for your
inadequacies. If you tried to pull a stunt like some of the ones that
have been suggested here I would toss you out in a second, which is
just about how long it would take to see right through you, and to be
clear, I've dropped many tens of thousands on individual software
projects and tossed a lot of vendors out the door for being ass
clowns.
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
