Hi Scott,
Is there any way to construct a function using a name
stored in a variable without resorting to "do"? For example:
on mouseUp
put "hello" into pData1
put "world" into pData2
put "shout" into test
do "answer" && test & "(pData1,pData2)"
end mouseUp
function shout pData1,pData2
return pData1 && pData2
end shout
Can the last line of the mouseUp handler be written without "do"? I'm not
against using "do", just wondering if there's another option.
on mouseUp
put "hello" into pData1
put "world" into pData2
put "shout" into test -- in a real world example the value of
"test" would be derived elsewhere
switch test
case "shout"
answer shout(pData1,pData2)
break
case "whisper"
answer "psst"&&pData2
break
case "bye"
answer "Hasta la vista,"&&pData2
break
case "anotherFunction"
answer anotherFunction(pData1,pData2)
end switch
end mouseUp
Rob Cozens CCW
Serendipity Software Company
"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."
from "The Triple Foole" by John Donne (1572-1631)
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
