Dave , Jac and all involved. Well some progress .....just why ?
Made no difference using revAnswerDailog from 2.8.1 but I used revStandalonesettings.rev from 2.8.1 and BINGO !!!! Standalone built on Rev 3.0 ....... Regards Camm ---- "J. Landman Gay" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've been looking at the problem reported by Camm and others and I > > *think* I have found at least part of the problem. The inability to save > > a stack with a password set and the answer dialog enabled. > > > > In my application, I have a "Dummy" Splash Screen Stack (call it > > "StartUp.rev") that servers as a place holder (as well as other things) > > to build a Standalone from, e.g. when I build a Standalone, I (at least > > initially and subsequently if I want to change settings), open the > > Standalone settings dialog which causes an array containing the settings > > to be written to custom props in StartUp.rev. When I look at this stack > > in the Application Browser, I see that there are now two Sub-Stacks in > > the StartUp.rev file: > > > > answer dialog > > ask dialog > > > > Also in the main stack of "StartUp.rev" I find that I have a group > > called "revLibraries", this contains a number of "buttons" that have > > code in them, such as "revXMLRPC, revPrintBack, etc. > > Yes, that's exactly the problem. > > > > > Is this normal? If not then I think the Standalone builder is somehow > > storing these items in the wrong file. > > Right. It isn't normal, and we'd determined that the files were being > written to the wrong stack. The problem is, we can't make it happen and > no one is sure why it's only happening to Camm (and now to you.) When we > reviewed his example stack, and tested on several machines, the files > were written correctly and the standalone built fine. Those on the list > who also tested it had no issues either. It's encouraging that you may > be able to reproduce it, that would be very helpful. > > > > > If you add password protection to this, it *might* be the problem people > > have been reporting. > > > > Any comments on this greatly appreciated. > > I'm sure you are correct. If you can figure out what is different about > your stack, and if it corresponds to something in Camm's stack, then we > may be able to figure it out. > > It would be interesting to see if you can build his sample stack. > Perhaps you could get a copy from him (or ping me privately and I'll > send it to you.) > > > -- > Jacqueline Landman Gay | [email protected] > HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
