Rene, FWIW, I think I've been asking for it since pre-Version 1. :-(
Judy http://revined.blogspot.com On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 2:10 AM, René Micout <[email protected]> wrote: > Bonjour Thierry, > Thank you, I have red that but it is not my problem... > They talk about QuickTime Player sounds... And I talk about QuickTime > Synthesizer sounds... > And my problem is about "duration" : sequences, overlap, etc. > I think days after days... Rev can not give me a satisfactory answer (in > french : j'en viens à douter quant à la capacité de Revolution à donner une > réponse satisfaisante à mon problème) > Revolution have not a musical orientation... > It is damage (?) because (for Macintosh) there are functions (in particular > through the QuickTime synthesizer) should not be too difficult (not for me > !!!) to call it by some appropriate commands. This is apparently not a > priority for the development team. Version 4 does not seem to be interested > in it, version 5 may be ? > René from Paris > > Le 11 févr. 09 à 10:43, Thierry a écrit : > > > Bonjour René, >> >> May be you could shime the thread about "playing multi-sounds", >> end of january on this list.... >> >> Judy, Scott and others gave some good advices ( and pitfalls ) >> about sounds and Rev... >> >> HTH, >> Thierry >> >> Hello ! >>> Actually my problem is making music with Rev (hi Beat !) on QuickTime >>> Synthesizer via PlayCommand Agent X (Shakobox : hi ! Jacqueline). >>> I have two solution to "do" duration (schematically): >>> 1. First solution : >>> A. Start sound >>> B. Wait x millisec >>> C. Stop sound >>> 2. Second solution : >>> A. Start sound >>> B. Send "Stop sound" in x millisec >>> With the first solution the sequences (and duration of and between >>> sounds) of sounds work very well but if I have a second sequence the sound >>> of this second sequence stop (and wait...) with the "wait" command of the >>> first sequence. >>> With the second solution the independance of sequences is right (no >>> waiting...) but the sequence is not right because sounds overlap and do not >>> really follow... >>> Someone have a third solution to satisfy both requirements ? >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> use-revolution mailing list >> [email protected] >> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your >> subscription preferences: >> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution >> >> > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
