In a message dated 2/27/09 12:28:03 PM, [email protected] writes:
> I'm a wee bit confused about this part. Why would you want an > openStack handler in a backscript that puts the stack script into the > back? > I want the utility stack to insinuate itself into the message heirarchy whenever I open it. In HC, I place it in use on openstack, so it receives messages from all stacks. In Rev, I see there are more options, and I have not learned enough to know which might be best, or whether one of several might do. But my issue here is simple, clean message passing in the way I always (HC) understood it. I want a stack that receives all messages from all stacks. Fortunately, I have it; my stack works fine. I just cannot have the msg box open at the same time. I am not experienced enough to find how this might be best implemented in Rev, (Stackinuse, backscripts, etc.) I just want what I consider basic functionality, and I want to feel that my HC expertise is valid here, at least in principle. I think I have found a bug. I am surprised, actually, that others are not more alarmed. Craig Newman ************** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1218822736x1201267884/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID %3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
