Hi Craig,
I'm glad you got it fixed.
Lots of front scripts in the IDE send messages to the message box. If
you put the message box both (almost) at the bottom and at the to of
the message hierarchy, you get a big mess.
Usually, I don't insert stack scripts into front or back. For this
purpose, I use buttons or substacks that are not part of my user
interface.
--
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Dutch forum: http://runrev.info/rrforum
Please visit <http://tinyurl.com/d6ojex> and click on "Stem" --Thank
you!
On 27 feb 2009, at 20:36, [email protected] wrote:
So I was looking at the actual openstack handler, which was:
"insert the script of this stack into back" (also was "start using
this
stack")
And thought I would change it to:
"insert the script of stack myStack into back"
Fixed. Done. And it all makes sense. I am relieved that it was me
and not
Rev.
One MINUTE later Jackie writes with basically the same idea.
In HC, my gadget is an external window, actually a more complex
object to
manage, but one that never could have this sort of issue. The very
ordinariness
of having a regular stack do the job opened the possibility of the
trap I fell
into.
Thanks to all. I got my hands dirty, which is what I really need.
Can't
wait to uncomment that stupid "/REVEXCLUDE02" line.
Is there anything to discuss about why putting the msg stack script
into
"back" is not a good idea?
Craig Newman
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
