Stephen; Right. I was cavalier in thinking I can validate Rev issues by emulating them in HC. This is not fair to Rev.
I like parentheses. But is this really a bug? Or just the way the parser works? I have many constructs in HC (get word line item 3 of the...) and I hope that this probably common and well regarded methodology is fully transparent to Rev, too. If I have to use parentheses, well, OK. So report or no? Anyone? Craig Newman In a message dated 3/12/09 12:07:47 PM, [email protected] writes: Odd. Yet this works properly: get word 1 of "aaa,bbb" answer item 1 of it put it Congratulations. You found a bug. Please report it to the QC. FYI - parentheses are your friend. the below construction works and makes it clearer anyway: answer item 1 of (word 1 of "aaa,bbb")this really a bug? Or just the way the parser works? ************** A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1219671244x1201345076/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668 072%26hmpgID%3D62%26bcd%3DfebemailfooterNO62) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
