I don't know if I will pursue this. Having all instances of a string in a list is MUCH better than hitting them sequentially. There are a few modifications I might suggest to the way the "find and Replace" dialog is accessed, and how the find string is loaded, but right now I think it is a better tool than HC's.
For example, unless I missed it (again), you have to have all tabs already open to search all scripts in a stack. This can be a pain; HC at least went through everything (there should be a third option in that menu, named "whole stack"). And I think the way the dialog loads the string to search for can be improved, for example, if the dialog is already open, you cannot just select a string in an existing script and hit Cmd-Shift-F to load that new string. You have to either type it in or close the dialog and invoke the shortcut. More important, again, is that these features seem generally to be discovered, not documented. And even MORE important is that the list members here are as passionate as they were twenty years ago. Rev has done that. Craig Newman In a message dated 3/19/09 12:15:25 PM, [email protected] writes: > The built-in Search and Replace will search scripts for you, with many > options (one stack, a whole stackfile, etc.) So until Craig finishes his > project, you can use the one Rev provides. > ************** Great Deals on Dell 15" Laptops - Starting at $479 (htt p://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220029050x1201385914/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doub leclick.net%2Fclk%3B212974460%3B34272906%3Bh) _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
