I didnt know i was conversing with people from north korea and iran.  In the 
us, japan, canada, mexico, brazil, iceland, south africa, russia, israel, 
india, and most of europe, etc. There is a difference between criminal law and 
civil contract law.  In most moderen democratic societies, the wording in 
product contracts are considdered about as binding as santa or the stuff car 
salesmen say right before they go off to "talk to the manager".  And that is 
because of a liile thing called "the reasonable man".  This basically means 
that a contract or law cannot be inforced if it goes outside of what would be 
reasonably considdered fair.  Ant that is because guys sitting behind big 
expensive oak drsks making big salaries baid for by big companies can not be 
assumed to ever act like reasonable men (bias and conflict of interest is a 
given).  Criminal law on the other hand is written by people we vote for and 
require to "uphold the constitution".  No such standerd is expected in contract 
law.  The only thing you can be expected to do when you purchace software is to 
not copy and sell it.  The rest is hilariously written bs and the court treats 
it as so. Sorry.  The truth.

-----Original Message-----
From: "Ruslan Zasukhin" <[email protected]>
To: "use-revolution" <[email protected]>
Sent: 3/21/2009 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: illegal creativity?

On 3/21/09 4:13 AM, "Randall Reetz" <[email protected]> wrote:

> All mosquitos are relevant.  It is scale that matters here.  Scale and
> reality.  Else all of us would be behind bars and prohibited from buying crest
> toothpaste.  Fair use and happy customers build brand loyalty faster than fear
> and loathing.  Not only that, customer inovation and parasitic coevolution is
> a sign of health and currency.  The lawyers play second fiddle to the guys in
> marketing and sales.

Randall,

I will add 2 cents ONCE.

If you vote publicly to break EULA of product which you have buy, then
excuse me -- you publicly cry that you are a criminal man.

Please understand this.

When you buy a product you read its EULA and say AGREE.
I.e. You PROMISE follow it. You have give your honest word.
Right?

If you do not like EULA of product then you should not buy it or use it.
Right?

EULA is kind of "contract" between vendor and YOU.
Right?

If you say publicly that you is ready break your own
    small contract/EULA = law

Then we can assume you can say go head, do not follow laws of your country
at all? Go and kill? Go and stole things from people?

I do not think you ready say this :)
EULA is also small law.


IF your product not fit limits of EULA of some product always possible talk
to vendor and negotiate some special contract with conditions your product
needs. Easy and valid way.

Also your idea that break EULA and they can buy you is FALSE.
Competition? Right Randall. IF company have write into EULA some limits then
obviously company thinks that break of this limits can hurt it market.

Company is not stupid to prohibit something that will looks like value
addition to its market. Clear? :-)


-- 
Best regards,

Ruslan Zasukhin
VP Engineering and New Technology
Paradigma Software, Inc

Valentina - Joining Worlds of Information
http://www.paradigmasoft.com

[I feel the need: the need for speed]


_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list


[truncated by sender]
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to