Richmond Mathewson wrote:
A while ago I wrote a message to one of the high-ups at Ubuntu offering
to let them have FREE linux versions of a couple of programs I made about
6 years ago about Phonetics using RR.

They were refused on the grounds that, while I was entitled to distribute
standalones free, they were built using proprietary software.

Personally I thought they were being a bit silly.

Being Linux folks, maybe not so silly. But those managing FOSS projects that run on proprietary commercial OSes like Windows and Mac OS do seem to be drawing their line in the sand rather arbitrarily:

To some purists, even Rev projects released under the LGPL will never been perceived as "true" open source projects because they require a proprietary engine to run. This of course overlooks that even if the Rev engine were open source it would still require the larger "proprietary engine": the OS itself.

All open source applications that run on Windows, Mac, or any other non-FOSS OS are just as "proprietary" as any Rev project released under similar license.

--
 Richard Gaskin
 Fourth World
 Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
 Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to