On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Richard Gaskin
<ambassador at fourthworld.com>wrote:

Andre wrote:

I'd rather have an inverse approach where every comment is approved by
default and we can flag the ones we think should be removed.


I'm normally quick to agree with you, but on this one I think your good
nature may have you underestimating the potential for problems.

I see valid points on both sides of this argument: It is in the Rev community's interests to have Notes appear as quickly and fuss-free as possible. It is also in the community's interests to have notes be accurate, well-written, non-repetitive, and non-spammish. Even when contributors are well intentioned, you can end up with a lot of noise. The Quality Control Center is a good example--I would say all of the contributors are well-intentioned, but a quick perusal of submissions finds lots of repetitive and spurious reports, as well as many that are too vague to be useful. The Rev team have to cull through all of the reports to find actionable ones.

In the case of Dictionary comments, there could be a third way. What if Rev allowed volunteers in the developer community to get "checked- out" in evaluating the quality of submissions. Once qualified, these volunteer editors could simply review submissions as they popped up, evaluate them on the spot according to RunRev's guidelines, and approve them. Result: time burden off the engineering team, high- quality comments ensured. I wouldn't mind spending a few minutes a day checking submissions. I know there are experienced folks here who, based on the quality of there contributions to the list, could do an excellent job in this role.

Such a system, I think, could keep most everyone happy, or at least everyone sort of not unhappy. :-)

Regards,

Devin

Devin Asay
Humanities Technology and Research Support Center
Brigham Young University

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to