No surprise there are such varied results. The server round trip times are probably dominated by the route intervals, as opposed to the script run times. IOW, the internet connection latency would be the decided factor for something like this. I suspect it will be most difficult to benchmark overall performance times, unless you are ON the server.
Also, it appears some may be confusing client side scripting with server side scripting. Even though one uses On-Rev, they still may need to use Javascript (along with a library like jQuery) on the client to do the mouseOver effects, dropdown menus or any of the AJAX stuff. So, it's still not a 'one language' total solution. To produce professional level websites, one will still need to have working knowledge of HTML, (xHTML), CSS, SQL, Javascript, and On-Rev,PHP or other language for server-side scripting. It also doesn't hurt to be facile with a CMS system. On-Rev can install WordPress with a single click, but I'm not sure it can use inline Rev scripting as it appears only .irev page extensions to work. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
