Richmond,
I may be all wet, but it seems to me that this custom Property thing
is just Rev's way of saying you are able to provide a pointer/handle
to some address in memory where all of the stuff you've put into it
may be accessed, and do so rather easily. I said I didn't like the
name, but that's not going to change, so??? I agree that the word
"property" provides a totally different mindset.
Joe Wilkins
On May 1, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
Maybe I'm having conceptual problems, but a custom
property looks awfully like another container (such as a
variable or a field) rather than a property as such.
I realise that a custom property can be used as a data-source
more rapidly than a field because it doesn't come with all
the 'trappings' of an object. However, what is not clear to me
is whether I can access data stored in the custom property
of an object from a script in another, rather like the way I can
access data stored in a field on a different card to the one
I am 'calling' from.
Peter Alcibiades wrote:
It would be nice to hear from Judy again. Did any of these
explanations
help? And did you try using a custom property, and did it work?
Peter
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
