Actually I'm not so sure it even matters, considering this isn't a typed language.
I was just surprised when I ran my first try at code and had errors at runtime. Almost every compiler I've used checked variables. Why I asked in the first place. On 5/9/09 5:24 PM, "Richmond Mathewson" <[email protected]> wrote: > Writing as someone who, generally, learns from his errors, and > trying to work out why they are error, this sounds as if it would > not be a great advantage to me. > > Probably much more useful for somebody trying to belt out > something with a very quick SDLC or turn-around. > > Mark Wieder wrote: >> Richmond- >> >> Saturday, May 9, 2009, 1:14:47 PM, you wrote: >> >> >>> So; what is 'strict compilation', and why should we be >>> interested? >>> >> >> "Strict compilation" was formerly referred to as "explictVars". >> Setting the checkbox *forces* you to declare all your variables or be >> faced with compile errors. The advantage is that it cuts down >> dramaticly on the number of bugs in one's coding. You can't, for >> example, mistakenly type and compile >> >> put the last chr of line x of field 3 >> or >> put thevariablenames into field 1 >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
