Maybe these should be listed under this enhancement request (although maybe the request should be a bug report instead):
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=7791 Bernard On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Kay C Lan <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Mark Wieder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was also surprised that ` was allowed. But >> >> put 42 into ` >> >> is a valid statement. It seems like more of a parlor trick than >> something that could be turned into a clever hack. And I also think >> it's a bug resulting from the ` character's place in the ASCII table. >> I notice that @ and _ and ? are also accepted as variable names. >> That's just wrong. You can hurt yourself playing around with these >> things. >> > > This is certainly not consistent with the User Manual: > > 5.5.5 Variable Names > The names of variables must consist of a single word and may contain any > combination > of letters, digits, and underscores (_). The first character must be either > a letter or an > underscore. You cannot use any Revolution Revolution language word as a name > of a > variable. > > Whilst I understand that Explicit Variables is the answer to the previous > example, in this case it looks like the Docs should be updated to reflect > reality, or if such chars are dangerous to use, then it should be filed as a > bug. > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
