I agree with Richard.
It looks like <http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?
id=7809> is NOT "fixed".
Can someone reopen the report? I think its severity should be changed
to "major".
I will go back to using 3.0, for now.
Tim Bleiler, Ph.D.
Instructional Designer, HSIT
University at Buffalo
Phone: 716-829-3867
On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Paul Looney wrote:
I have had the opposite happen.
On a large variable, sorting removed lines.
Rev 3.0, OS X 10.5
If memory serves, that was the result of a limitation of the sort
command where it could only be used reliably on data in which no
single line exceeded 65,535 chars.
According to the v3.5 Engine Change Log, that was fixed in v3.5:
<http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=5932>
Unfortunately the current limit is not noted in the docs for the
Sort command, nor in that report, so I don't know exactly what it is
in the latest version. But 64k of text was a lot for a single line,
so whatever it's been raised to should be plenty for most common
tasks.
Timothy's report of the trailing blank line may be a regression
error which had been marked as "fixed" in the 3.5 Engine Change Log:
<http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=7809>
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World
Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
