If this is true then it's good news. However, since plugins like Flash are able to make their own multiple network connections once they are instantiated, I'd be surprised to learn that plugin network connections piggy-back on the browser's connection. Since the revPlugin is visible as an application distinct from the browser in the running processes of the OS, the plugin is clearly not subsumed within the browser.
If you're right, then it sounds like providing Rev as a browser plugin might be even more complex than I'd imagined. Anyway, it's speculation like this that should have been resolved with a list of FAQs. I don't see myself using the plugin, so it's of academic interest to me. Bernard On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:20 AM, David Bovill<[email protected]> wrote: > It's the browser that will do the https for the plugin - the plugin will > just need to pass any additional security requirements which AFAIK there > aren't any as https is basically and encrypted wrapper around a normal http > stream. My guess on this would be that there will be no major issues with > secure https issues and the plugin - it should just work? _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
