Somehow the mailer put spaces between each line of code. Obviously that won't compile but it does look right in the editors.
------------------------- Stephen Barncard San Francisco http://barncard.com 2009/8/17 Richard Gaskin <ambassa...@fourthworld.com> > stephen barncard wrote: > > It's better for one to do one's own wrapping. >> for instance >> >> put field "myField" of cd "myCard" of stack "myStack" into field >> "myField2" >> of cd "nextCard" of stack "otherStack" >> >> is a horrible jumble of garbage to the eyes, but >> >> put\ >> >> field "myField" \ >> >> of cd "myCard" \ >> >> of stack "myStack" \ >> >> into field "myField2" \ >> >> of cd "nextCard" \ >> >> of stack "otherStack" >> >> >> makes a lot of sense. Automatic wrapping can't do that. And it's easier to >> edit the references. And the compiler and indenter both are happy with it. >> And one can make the edit window narrower. >> > > A good point, well illustrated. > > Another benefit of adding line wraps manually is that it requires you to > read the code at least well enough to find usful line breaks, sometimes a > useful task when inheriting a code base. > > -- > Richard Gaskin > Fourth World > Revolution training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com > Webzine for Rev developers: http://www.revjournal.com > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > use-revolution@lists.runrev.com > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution