Richmond Mathewson-2 wrote:
> 
> Not really, if the questions and answers are stored out with the stack in
> some sort of encoded document!
> 
> Obviously without the ability to password protect stacks the programmer
> who wants to protect his/her data (i.e. stuff other than scripts)
> will have to make an extra effort - but in computer-land all things are
> password protectable, and all password protection is crackable . . .
> 
> So, quite frankly, why bother about this at all?
> 

Then, if using password encryption is the same as not using it,
you are going to add your vote to dissable password protection
in revMedia 4. Right?

By the way, if all password protection is crackable...
Could anybody, in this mail list, deprotect the script of my stack:
http://www.geocities.com/capellan2000/Learn_Japanese_Syllabaries_v092.zip

Have a nice weekend!

alejandro

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Vote-to-disable-password-protection-for-revMedia-4-stacks-tp25096861p25097522.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to