Jerry- Monday, September 14, 2009, 6:54:29 AM, you wrote:
> I did a tree view of the code that worked on handlers and other > control structures. It just didn't hold up very well when scripts got > sizable. Also, dealing with the many variations of if-then-else was > not pleasant. I've still got code stubs in tRev to do folding, > actually, but I tend to think it is a case of rubbing revolution's fur > the wrong way. I've come to think it's not an ideal fit for the nature > of the language or the text editing nature of the editing environs. Not sure that I completely agree here, at least with the "nature of the language" part. Obviously you don't want to mess with the script itselfe, but for long handlers (come on, we've all got them) it's often hard to find the matching "end if" statement for an "if", especially if they're nested three or four levels deep. Folding is a way to indicate that, but there are other visual indicators that work as well: option-click or something on the start of a conditional to highlight the end statement, etc. -- -Mark Wieder [email protected] _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
