Le 16 sept. 09 à 21:18, stephen barncard a écrit :

Animated gifs are terrible for anything with much resolution.
256 colors, indexed.
Animated gifs are good for logos and block images but not gradients. And
they still stall in Rev if anything else is going on.

Compuserve invented and owned the patents on the .gif format up until a few years ago. Early on Compuserve tried to collect on every use of the every gif. It was a major reason for the superior open source PNG format to be
created.

On the horizon, working today: ANIMATED PNG<http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/APNG>


I have to add that considering a video as a simple sequence of images is a very inefficient concept. Most videos, most of the time, only feature slight variations from one frame to another. Hence the idea of including "key frames" with details and intermediary variations in typically smaller smaller chunks of data. Detecting abrupt changes from an image to the following one is a challenging task. The following example shows that this notion of "abrupt change" may be somehow subtle.

From what I remember of the draft of the future-MPEG-to-come in the late 90's, it was supposed to include information about "video objects". For instance, if you look at a football match (whatever flavor) chances are that you will see interesting action in the "foreground", i.e. players with fast movements which demand great detail, and a more or less static background (supporters) which is less interesting and hence, does not require high fidelity. The then- future MPEG was supposed to separate the two components and encode them differently. I do not know if this was ever implemented.

cheers
        François

_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription 
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution

Reply via email to