Thank you Sarah, Chris and Andre,
I use already a variable and my filter pattern is "*[' -]" & myString
& "*".
I'm going to try with a SQLite database.
Le 19 oct. 2009 à 23:49, Sarah Reichelt a écrit :
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 6:49 AM, Jérôme Rosat <[email protected]> wrote:
I wish to filter a list which contains approximately 300'000 lines.
I try
the "filter ... with" command. It's slow.
I try the "Repeat for each" loop but it's slower.
Is it possible to use the "filter ... with" command and to "force"
RunRev to
check only one "item" of the line and not the whole line with the
"filterPattern" ?
What filter pattern are you using? I have found filter to be very fast
even with large lists, provided the filter pattern is simple.
e.g. filter with "*blue*" is fast but filter with "*" & tab & "*" &
tab & "*blue* will be slow.
If this is the sort of thing you are trying, then I suggest a
preliminary fast filter to get the overall length down, then maybe
changing to a "repeat for each" loop to refine the filter.
And as Chris said, make sure you are always operating on a variable,
not the contents of a field.
Cheers,
Sarah
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
subscription preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
_______________________________________________
use-revolution mailing list
[email protected]
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
