Richmond, you can instantiate the palettes using an embed tag for each palette, then you can show or hide them with javascript.
it is a hack, but it works now. On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Richmond Mathewson < [email protected]> wrote: > Kevin Miller wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> >> > < snip > > > A new revWeb plugin for Windows and OS X (Linux coming soon) is now >> available from: >> >> http://revweb.runrev.com/ >> >> Major changes: >> >> Plugin has been re-engineered. This is the third and final (for 4.0) >> version >> of the architecture. >> >> This version resolves most of the short-comings of the previous 'alpha' >> version: >> - plugins can now run in multiple browsers simultaneously >> - orphaned processes will not be left around after plugin instances >> quit >> - if a plugin causes the engine to crash/exit, the browser will not be >> affected >> - system dialogs and answer alerts now layer correctly above the >> browser >> - popup menus from option and buttons etc. now function correctly >> - separate 'WebKit' version of the plugin for running under Safari >> (therefore 64-bit Safari on Snow Leopard works with the plugin) >> - the plugin works in IE Protected Mode >> - non-Roman languages can now be typed into fields [those requiring >> IMEs >> (Chinese, Japanese etc.) do not yet work on Mac OS X] >> >> >> > "the third and final (for 4.0) version" > > so palettised stacks in revlets are totally *...@%&ed in 4.0 ! > > This is ODD as I was led to understand that the problem with palettised > stack > loading behind the browser window was one of the top-priority problems. > > Having attended the RunRev conference in Edinburgh I returned to Bulgaria > confident in the knowledge that I could go ahead with my development of > a program/revlet that uses some 50-ish palettised substacks as at the > release > of 4.0 (about 14 days from now) all would be well. > > Beyond that one problem my program worked perfectly as a revlet: > now it is totally useless and can only be developed into a fully-fledged > standalone. > I had intended to release my 'Sanskrit Typewriter' on a Freemium model, > whereby the web-based version was FREE, and the standalone version, with > more features, would be for money; the former attracting folk to buy the > latter. That whole business model is now down the tubes; as is a lot of my > confidence in RunRev's promises, pronouncements and so forth. > > One wonders why there has been so much hype about the revWeb 'thing' when, > as development progresses it seems to lose features rather than gain them. > > Obviously I am (as my English grandmother used to say) "green as a cabbage > looking." > > I cannot believe I am the only programmer who has got him/herself "in a > stew" > about this. > > [Well, I suppose, even if nothing else, many users of this list will learn > some happy idioms, > similes amd metaphors that are not included in standard EFL courses . . . > :) ] > > > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your > subscription preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution > -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
