The Rev folks lost all audio in one of my presentations and asked me to recreate it. This was not something I wanted to do, but I spent 3 days, trying to figure out something close to what I said and trying to get the timing to match the recorded video. Quite an unpleasant and frustrating task when you know it was already done before. The result may have been stiff and boring, but given that the presentation was supposed to be somewhat informative, stiff and boring seems better than the alternative of silence.
Regards, Scott Rossi Creative Director Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design Recently, Andre Garzia wrote: > I recreated some sessions for last year DVDs... mostly because the recording > software broke on my laptop during the presentation so I lost all my screens > which were valuable. > > I rerecorded it a lot, I tried four or five times till I could get the > timing right but again, it was stiff and boring, it passed the message but > it was not entertaining as I wish it could be. I went to the film school and > those recreations would not pass by my own judgement. I plan to shoot some > tutorials though... > > :D > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 3:07 PM, stephen barncard < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> 16 hours of video is a PIA to edit render, duplicate and ship, if you've >> never done that before. >> >> It's a lot of work. Last year the DVDs were delayed for a long time, many >> times I assume due to presenters re-doing their live presentations for >> whatever reasons. Those re-recreations were pretty bad; stiff, and boring. >> A >> major attractor for me is the 'live' presentation, with the personality of >> the presenter coming through. >> ------------------------- >> Stephen Barncard >> San Francisco >> http://houseofcubes.com/disco.irev _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
