Yes, that's what I meant to say. Thanks, Mark
On Nov 18, 2009, at 8:04 AM, [email protected] wrote: > It sounds like you just did. You gave an object reference. I don't think > you even need to reference the group. > > Do you mean you want to address, say, the third object within a group, as > they are layered in that group, as opposed to their layering on the card? > > Craig Newman > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
