No. The "ramblings" only served to point out that your point was irrelevant because you were making it to a group who all found the original post to be of interest. Only you were offended. That seems to me unavoidable.
Bob On Nov 30, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Randall Reetz wrote: > Did your ramblings and indirection sufficiently derail my point? And you are > dead wrong on all of your statements. Talk to the meat of a statement or > don't talk. Anything else is obvious rhetorical maneuvering. Lawyer? > _______________________________________________ > use-revolution mailing list > [email protected] > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription > preferences: > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
