Yes, tRev is just an example, I fully understand that it may well not make any business sense for it to come in a Linux flavor. The point however where this does become an issue for RunRev itself is when, after quite a few of these entirely reasonable choices by the individuals concerned, the package that you are getting starts to vary a lot in functionality from one OS to the other. And that is the main reason I didn't buy the great megapack, which was indeed superb value were you on Windows, too many things either of interest, but not for Linux, or for Linux, but not of interest.
They definitely don't have to provide identical solutions. But there does need to be some thought about maintaining equivalence when not identity, which is why in this example I suggested plugins for a couple of the lightweight programming editors people use in Linux. Kate would be another possibility. There should be an alternative programming editor, one of the common Linux ones, to maintain parity. As a forinstance. I must say that Rev has always been very fair and pleasant to deal with, and for what I use it for, its just fine. I can work around the gaps and omissions well enough. And support from the community has always been outstanding. I was writing quite bluntly, but not in anger, rather in the spirit in which one says to one's bright teenage son, look, you are all set for a B. Just stop sitting in front of the TV for a few weeks, and you will get an A Now, you say to him, its going off, now. Obviously they have quite a bit on their minds right at the moment though -- View this message in context: http://n4.nabble.com/Rev-on-kde-tp1013369p1017818.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ use-revolution mailing list [email protected] Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
